Do Government Audits Reduce Corruption? — expanded estimators

Avis et al. (2018), JPE. https://doi.org/10.1086/699209

3 specifications. Effects are in outcome standard deviations; intervals are 95%.

Treatment adoption

Treatment adoption timing

S05-P001: seeded sample of 100 of 5,174 eligible units. Purple untreated; yellow treated; white unobserved.

AUDITS-T4-C1-CRACKDOWN

AUDITS-T4-C1-CRACKDOWN · S05-P001 · Data & fit details

67,262 observations · 5,174 units · 5,174 clusters · 1,651 treated / 3,523 control units.

Estimate comparison

S05-P001: point estimates, targets and available 95% intervals
Estimator Estimate (SDs) SE 95% CI Averaging
Static TWFE 0.023 0.017 [-0.009, 0.056] Coefficient
Dynamic TWFE 0.021 0.023 [-0.025, 0.066] Treated cells
BJS / did2s 0.025 0.012 [0.002, 0.048] Treated cells
Sun–Abraham 0.023 0.017 [-0.010, 0.056] Treated cells
CS-DID (equal event-time) 0.033 0.017 [-0.001, 0.067] Equal post-event times
CS-DID (treated cells) 0.023 0.017 [-0.011, 0.056] Treated cells
SDID 0.018 — — Treated cells
Matrix completion 0.023 — — Treated cells
Horizontal ridge 0.085 — — Treated cells

Event studies

Periods −10 to +10; pointwise 95% intervals where available.

Dynamic TWFE event study BJS / did2s event study Sun–Abraham event study CS-DID event study SDID event study Matrix completion event study Horizontal ridge event study

AUDITS-T4-C3-CONVICTION

AUDITS-T4-C3-CONVICTION · S05-P002 · Data & fit details

67,262 observations · 5,174 units · 5,174 clusters · 1,651 treated / 3,523 control units.

Estimate comparison

S05-P002: point estimates, targets and available 95% intervals
Estimator Estimate (SDs) SE 95% CI Averaging
Static TWFE 0.030 0.015 [0.000, 0.059] Coefficient
Dynamic TWFE 0.017 0.022 [-0.025, 0.060] Treated cells
BJS / did2s 0.031 0.014 [0.003, 0.059] Treated cells
Sun–Abraham 0.025 0.018 [-0.011, 0.061] Treated cells
CS-DID (equal event-time) 0.027 0.017 [-0.005, 0.060] Equal post-event times
CS-DID (treated cells) 0.026 0.019 [-0.011, 0.064] Treated cells
SDID 0.019 — — Treated cells
Matrix completion 0.029 — — Treated cells
Horizontal ridge 0.180 — — Treated cells

Event studies

Periods −10 to +10; pointwise 95% intervals where available.

Dynamic TWFE event study BJS / did2s event study Sun–Abraham event study CS-DID event study SDID event study Matrix completion event study Horizontal ridge event study

AUDITS-T4-C5-LEGAL-ACTION

AUDITS-T4-C5-LEGAL-ACTION · S05-P003 · Data & fit details

67,262 observations · 5,174 units · 5,174 clusters · 1,651 treated / 3,523 control units.

Estimate comparison

S05-P003: point estimates, targets and available 95% intervals
Estimator Estimate (SDs) SE 95% CI Averaging
Static TWFE 0.035 0.015 [0.005, 0.065] Coefficient
Dynamic TWFE 0.023 0.022 [-0.020, 0.066] Treated cells
BJS / did2s 0.038 0.014 [0.010, 0.066] Treated cells
Sun–Abraham 0.031 0.018 [-0.005, 0.067] Treated cells
CS-DID (equal event-time) 0.037 0.017 [0.004, 0.070] Equal post-event times
CS-DID (treated cells) 0.032 0.019 [-0.005, 0.069] Treated cells
SDID 0.025 — — Treated cells
Matrix completion 0.035 — — Treated cells
Horizontal ridge 0.197 — — Treated cells

Event studies

Periods −10 to +10; pointwise 95% intervals where available.

Dynamic TWFE event study BJS / did2s event study Sun–Abraham event study CS-DID event study SDID event study Matrix completion event study Horizontal ridge event study