---
title: "Consumer Spending during Unemployment: Positive and Normative Implications"
format:
  html:
    theme: cosmo
    toc: true
    embed-resources: true
    include-in-header:
      text: |
        <style>main{overflow-wrap:anywhere;max-width:1100px!important}table{display:block;overflow:auto;font-size:.85rem}td,th{padding:6px}img{max-width:100%}p code,li code{overflow-wrap:anywhere;white-space:normal}</style>
---

[Peter Ganong; Pascal Noel (2019)](https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170537). *American Economic Review*.

**Under development — community extension.** This is a provisional source-design assessment, not a new successful replication or a final eligibility ruling.

[Extension index](development.html) · [Provisional eligibility log](development.html#eligibility-log) · [Assessment JSON](aeraej-536.json) · [QMD](aeraej-536.qmd) · [Reproduction code](collection-code.zip)

## Source design and template applicability

The public targets are unemployment-exhaustion consumption profiles and structural model/calibration results, not a treated-versus-control DiD coefficient. Confidential household transaction data are also absent.

No DiD estimates, uncertainty intervals or homogeneity-test decision were computed in this tranche. No point is added to the calibration plots. This is not a zero effect or a failed statistical test.

## Recorded treatment-column measurement

**Data unavailable.**

The deposit contains aggregate event-series outputs, not individual account-level UI receipt/exhaustion records.

These are the existing data-measured counts, not counts inferred from design labels. A binary instrument, group indicator or interaction component need not be the treatment of interest; the source-design assessment above takes precedence for template applicability.

## Replication status

**This tranche:** unsupported design; source code/documentation inspected, no estimator run.

**Supplied library:** no_did_analysis_data; verification: public data absent; preparation: runs_with_shim. These are the library’s labels, not new verification claims. Missing data and unsupported designs are separate issues.

## Evidence and provenance

The following files in the supplied library were inspected. Their SHA-256 digests are recorded in the downloadable assessment JSON. Source archives and microdata are not redistributed.

- `AER/Ganong_Noel_AER_2019_116193/R/01_replicate_empirical_results.R` (430 lines)
- `AER/Ganong_Noel_AER_2019_116193/verdict.md` (52 lines)
- `AER/Ganong_Noel_AER_2019_116193/aeraej-536.md` (106 lines)