TROP and SDID time weights
One fixed representative example from each of 27 papers. TROP localization factors, SDID weights, estimates, tuning choices and exact-value downloads.
Open report →A collection of replication reports, empirical time-weight comparisons and methodological checks for panel-data studies.
The original 22 papers, retained together with their results and Peter Hull’s established collection criteria. The main collection remains at its existing public address.
One fixed representative example from each of 27 papers. TROP localization factors, SDID weights, estimates, tuning choices and exact-value downloads.
Open report →All 754 returned examples across 27 papers. Defaults alone for 520 close matches; both numerical solutions for 234. Sixty unavailable attempts are listed separately.
Open report →Interactive comparison for the first 13 papers, holding samples and regularization fixed. Includes the refined optimized reference.
Open report →360 returned examples from balanced subsets or shorter windows. Donor and treated-unit retention are shown; 58 zero-noise cases remain unavailable.
Open report →394 returned fits from 13 papers using the authors’ default implementation, with time weights and iteration-limit diagnostics. The analysis.html file is an identical alternate entry point.
Open report →Study-level data readiness, pre-period lengths, donor counts and blockers across the 262-paper inventory. A readiness assessment, not a count of successful replications.
Open report →Specification-level reconciliation of the collaborator audit; 26 cases reopened for follow-up. Design evidence, data availability and implementation readiness remain separate.
Open report →File-and-line evidence for fixed-effect dimensions in 245 author deposits. TWFE syntax alone does not establish a binary-treatment DiD interpretation.
Open report →Page-cited review of 36 targeted papers and corrections to earlier whole-paper exclusions. Remaining unreviewed cases are explicitly identified.
Open report →The extension collection, calibration figures, inventories and provisional eligibility log. Individual study links retain their established public URLs.
Open report →Entry point to the development collection’s eligibility log. Criteria and classifications remain subject to revision.
Open report →Three-page plot PDF, selected parameters, estimates, comparison tables and verification results.
Open report →Pinned author objective, scalable equivalent optimization and direct author-code validation.
Open report →Reference-weight summaries, support and recent-mass changes, with links to the final precision refinements.
Open report →Higher-precision solutions for nearly flat time-weight objectives, including the Italian opera examples.
Open report →Author solver with tighter budgets, sparsification comparisons and initial QP diagnostics. Use the summary and precision supplement for the final reference weights.
Open report →Sample-retention summaries, numerical verification, final reference weights and the profile PDF.
Open report →High-precision checks for initializer-sensitive and low-donor examples.
Open report →Frozen complete-case and earlier-window rules, treatment-path checks and numerical analysis.
Open report →SDID, matrix completion, ridge and multisynth comparisons, event studies, tuning and bootstrap results. Historical report retained with its original method labels.
Open report →Historical experiment predating the pinned author-TROP comparison above. Its TROP-labeled estimates use the earlier implementation and should be read separately.
Open report →Worked application of the extended regression and counterfactual-estimation template.
Open report →Source and estimator-specific documentation accompanying the extended worked example.
Open report →Village officials and subsidies: the initial AEJ archive example, with replication results and estimator-specific limitations.
Open report →Earlier event-study and deviations-test worked example. Later counterfactual and collection reports are linked separately.
Open report →A separate methodological note shared in the discussion, outside the empirical DiD collection.
Open report →No reports match this search.